I found the following quite fascinating. Many who study and practice mindfulness are of course inspired by the wondrous lifestyle changes they experience through regular mindfulness practices; which I would add, often includes the development of cultural awareness. On the flip side, listening to a recent radio broadcast about the pros and cons of diversity training in the workplace on Talk of The Nation (National Public Radio) I found comments made by Elizabeth Levy Paluck, Assistant Professor of Psychology at Princeton University, extremely interesting and cause for further inquiry.
Paluck put forth that becoming more mindful and conscious of diversity actually may increase stereotyping in the workplace! According to Paluck, "One topic that's been brought up is that when training and education may activate bias rather than reduce it, and so this is something that psychologists study quite a bit. So when you make these explicit and conscious attempts to regulate your thoughts - and that's not necessarily what all the diversity training does, but we do know that this can sometimes exaggerate stereotyping and raise issues that might otherwise not come up in the workplace. And oftentimes, women and minorities are, you know justifiably upset when this happens."
In light of this, should we thus make attempts to become less mindful? If we know that our attempts to become less judgmental, less biased, and more humane and more civil only serve to make the workplace situation worse, should we therefore curtail attempts to educate workers about diversity? Should we discourage workers to practice enlightened thinking around issues of diversity? My own inclination is to say absolutely "no"; yet based on the above, an important question is raised: is it even possible to consciously increase our emotional intelligence quotient (EQ)? Or, are we merely opening a new can of worms - in the form of increased judgments and critical thoughts - when we attempt to do so?
What Paluk identifies is a fascinating occurance: when we practice conscious thinking, we also paradoxically somehow send off more harmful vibes - the exact opposite of positive EQ.
What she describes may actually make some sense. We all know iritating people who seem to do and say all the right things, yet underneath, (their sometimes facades) seem full of moralistic judgments and toxic thinking. I would like to believe, though, it may only be a temporary phenomenon. That over time any person's diligent, authentic efforts to shape EQ and character eventually pay off for the best, and, ultimately can serve to contribute to a more compassionate and socially conscious workplace.
Audio link to broadcast
http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=124495770&m=124495767
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Paul,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the add over at Facebook. Interesting blog entry. I reminds me of Romans 7, in which Paul discusses how the law actually excited sin in him. It also reminds me of the phenomenon that occurs in those with obsessive-compulsives in which the intentional avoidance of thoughts multiplies their occurrence. Do you have any reflections as well?
Thanks,
Robert
Great analogy Robert! I can definitely see the relationship between the scripture you mentioned and what she is talking about here in this article. It's like if I said to you, "hey don't think about that big, lime green elephant" Presto! you are thinking about a big, lime green elephant.
ReplyDeleteHowever, as I mentioned in the article though, I think it may have something to do with the beginning aspects of self-change, mindfulness work. As time goes on some of this may subside. Actually in the yogic tradition, in Patanjali's practice of yoga, there is talk about the 'attenuation of thoughts' as one moves higher into the stages of yoga, awakening of a deep detachment. Any obsessive, dark, negative, anxious, or judgmental thoughts begin to dissipate as we continue our spiritual practices and self-work.